SoftInWay - Conceptual turbomachinery design and optimization
    Home     AxSTREAM    Engineering Services     Education      About us       Resources       News       Careers     Contact us
Energy rules the world





Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004
Power for Land, Sea, and Air
June 14-17, 2004, Vienna, Austria



GT2004-53379


Methods and Tools for Multidisciplinary Optimization
of Axial Turbine Stages with Relatively Long Blades


Leonid Moroz
SoftInWay, Inc.
Yuri Govorusñhenko
SoftInWay, Inc.
Leonid Romanenko
SoftInWay, Inc.
Petr Pagur
SoftInWay, Inc.

ABSTRACT

An effective methodology for optimal design of axial turbine blades is presented. It has been used for achieving stage maximal efficiency meeting both stress-strain and vibration reliability requirements and taking into account technological limitations.

INTRODUCTION

Problem formulations of the turbine flow path optimization reflect main phases of axial turbines design practice [1] and use increasingly accurate models of elaborated designs. As the industry moves forward, integration of 3D modeling of aerodynamic and strength of material characteristics into optimization process generates continuously increasing interest. Usually, such optimization refers to analysis of separate blade row or isolated stage [2 - 7, 9] and involves a large number of optimization parameters. This leads to enormous computational time and requires significant computational resources. Nevertheless, 3D modeling is an important part of numerical modeling along with conventional 1D and 2D approaches.

This paper describes a process of optimal flow path design that is achieved through the following steps:

  • rapid flow path design and optimization using reduced order models and axi-symmetrical solver;
  • blade cross-sections profiling according to aerodynamic criteria, blade stacking (3D profiling) with optimized twist/lean;
  • generation of parameterized mesh for buckets and parameterized grid for inter-blade passages;
  • detailed 3D CFD computations and finite element structural and modal analyses with commercial CFD and FEA tools;
  • design optimization using design of experiment (DoE) methods and reduced order models.

Process begins from preliminary flow path design. Tools such as AxSTREAM™ allow significantly reduce the search range for bucket optimal configuration. AxSTREAM™ uses stage and airfoil optimizations that are based on DoE methods in combination with 2D aerodynamic and 1D structural calculations. Computed data can be exported to external tool for mesh and grid generation.



MinuteMesh-Turbo, a parameterized mesh generator specifically developed for turbomachinery applications can be used as a preprocessor for industry standard CFD and FEA packages. MinuteMesh-Turbo generates complete FE models consisting of structured mesh, loads, boundary conditions (BC's) and material properties. Models are optimized for modal, harmonic and structural analyses with FEA solver of choice. FE model could contain one blade, a packet of blades and up to a full bladed disk assembly with all components: airfoils, shroud, tiewires, root, disk, etc. MinuteMesh-Turbo also creates a grid of inter-blade flow path for CFD analysis.

AxPLAN DoE tool makes possible to decrease a number of time-consuming 3D computations by evaluating the response function sensitivity to varied parameters. It also formulates and solves optimization problems, and acts as pre- and postprocessor. Besides this, it is possible to store and re-use reduced order models for quick design of geometrically similar buckets without detailed 3D CFD computations.

Described tools are seamlessly integrated with industry standard 3D CFD and FEA packages and, therefore, can be used by design organizations with minimal changes to established design practices.

NOMENCLATURE

α1 nozzle exit angle;
β2 blade exit angle;
δ1 nozzle lean;
δ2 blade lean;
à – vector of geometrical parameters;
P – vector of operational parameters;
m1, m2 – nozzle and blade twist parameters;
t, T – time;
Q – vector of varied parameters;
Y – vector of response function;
NURBS – non-uniform rational B-spline;



1   2    3   4    5    6    7    8   9    10    Next >>