|
Fig 12. CFD vs SoftInWay comparisons. Power on the various
stages.
SUMMARY
Modern day flow path design and optimization tools provide
designers with new and powerful capabilities to analyze, compare
and weight numerous design solutions based on myriad of
variables.
While no design may be optimally “perfect” those capabilities
the gas turbine communities now possess give them the
opportunity to approach the design process in a whole new
manners just as described in the title of this paper, “Advanced
Gas Turbine Concept, Design and Evaluation Methodology”
|
REFERENCES
1. Moroz. L., Govorushńhenko Y., Romanenko L., Pagur P.
“Methods and Tools for Multidis-ciplinary Optimization of Axial
Turbine Stages with Relatively Long Blades”. Proceedings of
Turbo Expo 2004. 14-17 June Vienna, Austria.
2. Miller, M. J., Durschmidt, D. F., Medlock, A. and Sandel, W.
A. “An Integrated Design System for Fans, Compressors, and
Turbines: Part I: Overview”, Proceedings of Turbo Expo 2004.
June 14-17, Vienna, Austria.
3. Moroz L., Govorushchenko Y., and Pagur P. “Axial Turbine
Stage Design: 1D/2D/3D Simulation, Experiment, Optimization
— Design of Single Stage Test Air Turbine Models and
Validation of 1D/2D/3D Aerodynamic Computation Results
Against Test Data”, Proceedings of Turbo Expo 2005. June 6-9,
Reno-Tahoe, Nevada, USA.
4. Aungier R.H., “Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and
Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis”, ASME Press, 2006.
5. Jiang Hongde, Xu Kepeng, Li Baoqing, Xu Xinzhong, Chen
Qing. “A Precise Full-dimensional Design System for Multistage
Steam Turbines. Part I: Philosophy and Architecture of the
System”. Proceedings of Turbo Expo 2007. May 14-17,
Montreal, Canada.
|