|
ABSTRACT
This article deals with the conceptual approach to optimize
efficiency and power of a highly loaded gas turbine flow path
design. Different problems were analyzed during low pressure
turbine (LPT) preliminary design of high-bypass aircraft jet
engine.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
At present, turbomachines’ elements design using integrated
software is developing intensively [1, 2, 3, etc.] Simplified models
of computation (1D/2D) [1, 4] as well as precise full-dimensional
ones [5] may be used in such systems. A comparison of
aerodynamic computational results using carefully selected 1D/2D
models and CFD analysis with experimental data [3, 4] is
evidence of simplified calculations adequate accuracy for
preliminary design.
More detail review of the integrated software for
turbomachines design you can find in [5].
Gas turbine engine qualitative characteristics are determined by
the concepts taken into account on early phases of engine
components design [1].
Design specification requires a mandatory parameters values
list and the main requirements were high efficiency value (~94
%), weight minimization, strict axial and radial dimension
constraints and outlet flow angle deviation from axial direction
restriction to a value less than 20 deg. Complex turbine flow path
outline shape in meridional plane is the result of these facts.
Several low pressure turbine designs with 6 and 7 stages were
examined to ensure turbine reliability. Flow path designs in
meridional plane with given axial and radial constraints is
presented on Fig 1.
The LPT was designed with the help of a multidisciplinary
turbomachinery design and optimization suite. It allowed for
designing various turbine flow paths while meeting specification
requirements.
Turbomachinery design and optimization suite gave the
designer a possibility to use different tools to solve flow path
design and analysis tasks. Optimization tasks formulations are
very flexible. Software service functions provide convenient
interface with data project, strong reliability and quick response
during the design process.
Tasks used during the turbine scheme definition and their
descriptions are listed below:
- Multistage preliminary flow path design is based on finding the
solution of 1D problem in inverse formulation. Quasi-random
search methodology is used to find optimal solution.
- Preliminary chords and relative pitch values estimation provides
minimum total losses taking into account structural and modal
constraints.
|
- Flow path design in meridional plane and stage-by-stage heat
drop distributions are found with the help of searching the solution
of 1D problem in direct formulation.
- Optimal blade twist and lean laws determination is made with
the help of stage-by-stage axisymmetric analysis using Design of
Experiment based study engine to search optimum solution on
response functions.
- Planar cascades are profiled using various criteria such as
minimizing the maximum profile shape curvature and minimizing
profile losses.
- High efficient 3D blade shapes are designed to minimize turbine
weight taking into account structural and modal constraints
calculated using beam theory and 3D FEM analysis.
- Final aerodynamic efficiency estimation of different designs is
made with CFD simulations. Calculation results are compared
with each other to find optimal design.
Initial data for the first design are reported in the Table 1.
Table 1. Initial design data
| 1
|
Design point
|
|
| 1.1
|
LPT Inlet Total Temperature
|
1144.3 [K]
|
| 1.2
|
LPT Inlet Total Pressure
|
323.64 [kPa]
|
| 1.3
|
HPT Exit Swirl (from axial direction)
|
20 [deg]
|
| 1.4
|
LPT Rotational Speed
|
2020 [rpm]
|
| 1.5
|
LPT Inlet Mass Flow
|
39.39 [kg/s]
|
| 1.6
|
LPT T-T Pressure Ratio
|
7.26 [-]
|
| 1.7
|
DH/T (cpDT/Tin)
|
424.7 [J/kgK]
|
| 1.8
|
Fuel to air ratio
|
0.0165
|
| 1.9
|
Max Tip Speed (LPT last Blade)
|
200 [m/s]
|
| 1.10
|
HPT Exit Inner Diameter
|
0.750 [m]
|
| 1.11
|
HPT Exit Outer Diameter
|
0.875 [m]
|
| 1.12
|
LPT Inlet Hub Diameter (recommended)
|
0.957[m]
|
| 1.13
|
LPT Inlet Tip Diameter (recommended)
|
1.097[m]
|
| 1.11
|
LPT Efficiency required, min
|
94.0% [-]
|
| 2
|
Geometry constraints
|
|
| 2.1
|
Exit LPT Max Swirl Angle (from
axial direction)
|
25 [deg]
|
| 2.2
|
Max LPT Length (duct included)
|
|
| 2.3
|
LPT Outlet Tip Diameter, max
|
1.866[m]
|
| 2.4
|
TE edge diameter, min
|
0.7[mm]
|
|